NeurIPS

5 stories

NeurIPS is the annual machine-learning conference and its paper-review and publication process. Recent coverage has focused on when NeurIPS'26 final decisions will be released (whether they’ll follow the Sep 24 AoE deadline or appear around Sep 18), a site‑selection email that is not an acceptance notice, and the Position Paper Track’s use of the Pangram AI detector that desk‑rejected 178 papers (18.4%) and flagged chairs’ papers at 24–69% before a retune.

Related topics

NeurIPS 2026 venue allocation concerns

NeurIPS 2026 will have multiple venues; Sydney passes sold out in minutes. Authors were asked to pick preferred locations but are not guaranteed to present there, raising concerns about a single 'main' venue concentrating resources and unfairly distributing presentations.

r/MachineLearning · · Details

Agents can't enable recursive self‑improvement

A new paper had authors hand agents accepted-but-unpublished NeurIPS papers (evaluated by the original authors); Codex/GPT-5.6 Sol and OpenClaw/Opus 4.8 failed to reproduce open-ended ML research. The authors argue this implies current agents cannot drive recursive self‑improvement (RSI), questioning near‑term explosive AI progress.

r/MachineLearning · · Details

NeurIPS site-selection email: what it means

An author received NeurIPS’s site-selection email and wonders if it’s routine or signals higher acceptance odds; the message is not an acceptance notice and the author asks whether every non-withdrawn submission got it.

r/MachineLearning · · Details

NeurIPS desk-rejected 178 papers using AI detector

The NeurIPS Position Paper Track used a proprietary AI detector, Pangram, to desk-reject 18.4% (178) of submissions without human review. Independent checks found the detector flagged track chairs’ own papers at 24–69%, initially labeled nearly half of submissions as 90–100% AI, and was later retuned to reduce the flag rate to 12.7%.

r/MachineLearning · · Details
That is everything