Opus 4.8

4 stories

Opus 4.8 is one of the models in Anthropic's Claude line, and some users treat it as a good-value default choice. Recent coverage includes a Reddit report that Claude and Opus 4.8 declined to help flash a Xiaomi router to OpenWrt while Qwen3.8 27b completed the task, and a paper in which OpenClaw/Opus 4.8 failed to reproduce open-ended ML research.

Related topics

Critique: 1Password's AI Patching Benchmark

A critique of 1Password's August 6, 2026 report says its 26% "clean fix" rate is misleading: the sample focused on difficult bugs, 22% of trials instructed agents to apply wrong fixes, 36% forbade building or testing, and models used different reasoning settings. The authors also released agent skills for post-patch validation and review walkthroughs.

Hacker News ·

Agents can't enable recursive self‑improvement

A new paper had authors hand agents accepted-but-unpublished NeurIPS papers (evaluated by the original authors); Codex/GPT-5.6 Sol and OpenClaw/Opus 4.8 failed to reproduce open-ended ML research. The authors argue this implies current agents cannot drive recursive self‑improvement (RSI), questioning near‑term explosive AI progress.

r/MachineLearning ·

What default model do you use?

A Hacker News thread asks which default model people use. One user says they use Claude most, find Fable overkill and costly for their needs, and has made Opus 4.8 their go-to due to good value while avoiding Opus 5 for now.

Hacker News ·
That is everything