NeurIPS
35 storiesNeurIPS is an annual machine learning research conference. Recent discussion has centered on logistics for the 2026 edition: an unresolved Sydney registration waitlist, Paris complimentary registrations that were full before the reviewer batch opened, and authors seeking others to present their posters because they cannot fund travel. Other threads cover AI-generated peer reviews, delayed Google Scholar indexing of citations, and accepted work such as TempoPFN.
NeurIPS 2026 will have multiple venues; Sydney passes sold out in minutes. Authors were asked to pick preferred locations but are not guaranteed to present there, raising concerns about a single 'main' venue concentrating resources and unfairly distributing presentations.
A new paper had authors hand agents accepted-but-unpublished NeurIPS papers (evaluated by the original authors); Codex/GPT-5.6 Sol and OpenClaw/Opus 4.8 failed to reproduce open-ended ML research. The authors argue this implies current agents cannot drive recursive self‑improvement (RSI), questioning near‑term explosive AI progress.
Users are asking when NeurIPS'26 final decisions will be released, whether they will strictly follow the Sep 24 AoE deadline or could be released earlier around Sep 18 AoE (ICLR abstract deadline).
An author received NeurIPS’s site-selection email and wonders if it’s routine or signals higher acceptance odds; the message is not an acceptance notice and the author asks whether every non-withdrawn submission got it.
The NeurIPS Position Paper Track used a proprietary AI detector, Pangram, to desk-reject 18.4% (178) of submissions without human review. Independent checks found the detector flagged track chairs’ own papers at 24–69%, initially labeled nearly half of submissions as 90–100% AI, and was later retuned to reduce the flag rate to 12.7%.
That is everything