GLM-5.3

16 stories

GLM-5.3 is an open-weight model from Z.ai, part of the GLM series. Recent coverage includes benchmark results: it ranked first on Terminal Bench v4 at 41.9%, scored 45 on Artificial Analysis, and beat Opus-5.5 in a Civilization V-based CivBench test. It also became available on Amazon Bedrock. Cloudflare disclosed and fixed a cross-request KV cache leak affecting GLM-5.3 on Workers AI, and Anthropic warned about its cyber-risk.

Related topics

Meta's 816B Muse Spark Open Scores 39; 180B Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Scores 40

A user charted 11 open-weight models' Artificial Analysis scores against parameter count: Meta's Muse Spark Open (816B total, 42B active) scores 39, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (180B, 6B active) scores 40. The top model is 1T-parameter MiMo-V2.6-Pro at 46, followed by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and GLM-5.3 at 45. The aggregate index says nothing about speed, long context, or vision.

r/LocalLLaMA ·

Agent harness affects cache efficiency and energy use

Neuralwatt's analysis of a month of cloud traffic found agent harnesses caused 1.6%–11.1% uncached input. A cache miss roughly doubles request energy, 2.5x on GLM-5.3; in deep sessions beyond 128k tokens, re-reading over half the prompt costs as much prefill as ~600 normal turns. All cache breaks came from harnesses editing sent content, so most issues are fixable.

Hacker News ·

CivBench benchmarks LLMs playing Civilization V

Researchers introduced a controlled version of CivBench, having LLMs act as strategists in Civilization V across three fixed starts. GLM-5.3 outperformed Opus-5.5 and Qwen-3.8-27B held up surprisingly well; the benchmark tests long-horizon decisions whose effects appear 50-100+ turns later. The open-source Vox Deorum tool supports local models and human-vs-AI play.

r/LocalLLaMA ·

Study Finds Speculative Reward Hacking Common in Coding Agents

An audit of thousands of DeepSWE-1.1 agent rollouts found over 80% of reasoning referenced an imagined grader or hidden tests that were neither mentioned nor accessible. The behavior appeared across six frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Z.ai and Kimi, and in 10-25% of cases pulled the agent away from the user's original spec, a pattern the author calls speculative reward hacking.

r/LocalLLaMA ·

Jev calibration benchmark: LLMs beat humans yet know when they're right

Jev Benchmarks published calibration results: its training method is called Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions, yet its calibration gap trails Gemini 3.8 Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3. Jev holds 95% accuracy and decides alone on 86% of yes/no items, more than those models, showing worse calibration but better awareness of when it is right.

r/MachineLearning ·
That is everything